International Disability Rights News
Service
Click here
for today's headlines & home page
Keeping advocates informed, inspired and connected since
1999.
Click
here for daily or weekly delivery . . . OR
Try Inclusion Daily Express for ten days FREE
. . .
Supreme Court Sends Back Penry Case For Fourth Death Penalty
Sentencing Trial
By Dave Reynolds, Inclusion Daily Express
June 26,
2006
HOUSTON, TEXAS--John Paul Penry will likely face a fourth trial to
determine whether he has mental retardation and therefore could face the death
penalty.
Penry, 50, confessed to raping Pamela Moseley Carpenter, and then stabbing her to death with a pair of scissors in 1979.
But the question of whether Penry has a mental disability that makes him less responsible for his actions has brought the sentencing portion of his case before the U.S. Supreme Court three times. Each time, the high court sent his case back to Texas to be retried, after determining that the trial judges gave confusing or conflicting instructions to their juries.
The most recent time was two weeks ago, when the Justices upheld a Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruling made last October, which found that the judge in Penry's 2002 sentencing trial gave improper, confusing instructions to that jury.
The high court's June 11 decision means that Texas prosecutors could hold a fourth trial to determine whether he spends the rest of his life in prison or dies by lethal injection.
Penry's supporters have described him as having "the mind of a 7-year-old", that he believes in Santa Claus and likes to draw with color crayons. His attorneys maintain that he has mental retardation, and spent many of his younger years in a state-run institution. Penry has scored between 51 and 63 on IQ tests, well below the 70 mark considered by most experts to suggest mental retardation.
Prosecutors say he is a manipulative psychopath who pretends to have an intellectual disability in order to avoid execution.
In 1989, the Supreme Court used Penry's case to conclude that executing people with mental retardation does not amount to "cruel and unusual punishment" and should not be banned under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In 2002, the same court reversed itself, ruling in the case of Atkins v. Virginia that convicts determined to have mental retardation cannot face execution. However, the Supreme Court did not tell the states how to decide whether a person has the disability.
Of the 399 inmates currently on Texas' death row, only a handful have been behind bars longer than Penry.
At one point in 2000, he came to within three hours of execution before the Supreme Court intervened.
Related:
"High court sends Penry case back for trial" (Fort Worth
Star-Telegram)
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/state/14803592.htm
"A
Death Sentence Courts Can't Seem to Live With" (Los Angeles Times)
http://www.inclusiondaily.com/news/06/red/0626a.htm
"John
Paul Penry" (Inclusion Daily Express Archives)
http://www.inclusiondaily.com/news/laws/penry.htm
"The
Death Penalty and Mental Retardation" (Inclusion Daily Express)
http://www.inclusiondaily.com/news/laws/deathpenalty.htm
Copyright © 2006 Inonit Publishing
Please do not
reprint, forward, or post without permission.
Click here for top of this page
Purchase this story for your website or newsletter . . .
Here's what subscribers say about Inclusion Daily Express. . .
Keeping advocates informed, inspired and connected since
1999.
Click
here for daily or weekly delivery . . . OR
Try Inclusion Daily Express for ten days FREE
. . .
Inclusion Daily Express
3231 W. Boone Ave., # 711
Spokane, Washington 99201 USA
Phone:
509-326-5811
News@InclusionDaily.com
Copyright © 2006 Inonit Publishing